نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری اندیشه‌های سیاسی، واحد تهران جنوب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2 استادیار گروه علوم سیاسی و روابط بین‌الملل، واحد تهران جنوب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Dominance, monopoly, and the exercise of power lead to inequality, injustice, and marginalizing the oppressed person with unpleasant consequences for the individual and the society. The present study aims to address the issue of domination as one of the obstacles in the way of women’s progress and their participation in development and politics.
As a qualitative research, this study uses hermeneutic method of Quentin Skinner. Skinner considers the intension of the author and the relevant context. Therefore, with the use of Skinner’s method and his recommendation to interpret specific beliefs by placing them in the context of other beliefs, four communitarian thinkers are selected to examine John Stuart Mill’s opinion about gender domination. Their opposing ideas are also presented in a table with the help of Hegel's triple dialectical method.
The question is; from the point of view of the selected communitarians, how valid is the cause of gender domination in the thought of John Stuart Mill? The findings revealed that most of the selected communitarians except Nussbaum consider the society and social ties to be involved in domination and do not consider the liberal solution to amend the laws and institutions to remove dominance.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)