نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری گروه معارف اسلامی- رشته فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی، واحد محلات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، محلات، ایران
2 استادیار ، گروه معارف، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، سمنان ، ایران
3 استادیار، گروه الهیات و معارف اسلامی، واحد محلات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مجلات، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Divorce and related issues have always been one of the main and challenging issues of legal systems in different societies. The purpose of this article is to analyze the jurisprudence and legal representation of women in divorce and compare it with the French legal system. This research is an applied research and the method used is descriptive-analytical method. According to the findings of this study, the approach of Iranian and French law regarding divorce, despite the similarity in many cases, is different due to differences in principles in this field. In Iranian law, following the principles of Imami jurisprudence, the right to divorce is exclusively available to men, but over time and with the change in the structure of societies, to control and adjust this right in Iranian law, the wife's power of attorney in divorce with conditions based on jurisprudential sources accepted. In French law, on the other hand, the issue of power of attorney in the execution of a divorce is accepted with the control of a marital judge. Divorce has no meaning and is a useless condition. Comparing the intellectual foundations, the course of social developments, as well as examining the different perspectives of these two schools of law can be effective in identifying the bottlenecks, challenges and ways out and ultimately preventing the impact of destructive factors on the family foundation.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)
