An Investigation of Affecting Factors on Women’s Participation among Selected Countries in the Middle East

Document Type : Research Paper

Abstract

Economic development that is the most fundamental issue in the world has attracted the attention of developing countries. Economic development requires changes in the society that can also cause deep and lasting growth and prosperity of nations. Economic development depends on the participation of all members of society, both men and women. Thus, the affecting factors on women’s participation have been analyzed among selected countries in the Middle East. The findings based on panel data econometrics in 13 countries of the Middle East from 2005 to 2014 show that the variables of ratio of female employment to population, life expectancy for women in these countries is effective and have a positive and significant effect on ratio of female to male force participation rate. However, per capita GDP growth variable in changes explaining of ratio of female to male force participation rate variables among these countries had a significant and negative effect.

Keywords


- Abdullah, N. & Abu Bakar, N.A. (2011). "The Causal Relationship between Fertility and Women Labor Force Participation: Evidence for the Four Selected Asian Countries", European Journal of Social Sciences, 26(2), pp. 154-158.
- African Development Indicators (2013). http://publications.worldbank.org
- Al-Botmeh, S. (2013). Policies to Improve Labour Movement's Participation in Public Policy, Palestine Economic Policy Research Institute.
- Boserup, E., Tan, S. F., Toulmin, C. (2014). Woman’s role in economic development, Routledge.
- Cain, G.G. (1966). Labor Force Participation of Married Women. Chicago: University ofChicago Press.
- Cavalcanti, T. V., Tavares, J. (2011). Women prefer larger governments: Growth, structuraltransformation, and government size, Economic Inquiry, 49(1), pp.155-171.
- Department of Statistics (DoS) (2008). Women and Men in Jordan in Figures, Amman, Jordan, Department of Statistics.
- Durand, J. (1975). The Labour Force in Economic Development: A Comparison of InternationalCensus Data, 1946-1966.
- Ellingsæter, A.L. & Ronsen, M. (1996). The dual strategy: mother hood and the work contract inScandinavia. European Journal of Population,12, 239–260.
- European Commission (2011). Strategy for Equality between Women and Men 2010-2015, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
- Gaddis, I., Klasen, S. (2014). Economic development, structural change, and women’s laborforce participation, Journal of Population Economics, 27(3), pp.639-681.
- Ghoreishi, Fardin et al. (2011). The study of affecting factors the social participation of women over 20 years old in Tabriz, Journal of Economic Sociology and Development, second issue, pp. 115-141.
- Godfrey, Njimanted & Emmanuel, Mukete (2016). The Implication of Female Labour Force Participation onEconomic Growth in Cameroon, International Journal of Development and Economic Sustainability, Vol.4, No.1, pp.34-47.
- H’madoun M. (2010).‘Religion and Labor Force Participation of Women Faculty Of Applied Economics, University of Antwerp. Downloaded from http://www.ua.ac.be/tew;accessedon21
- Hill, M.A. (1983). Female Labour Force Participation in Developing and Developed Countries:Consideration of the Informal Sector. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 65(3), 459–468.
- International Labour Organization (ILO). 2013. Global Employment Trends 2013: Recoveringfrom a second jobs dip (Geneva)
- Kaur, H. Tao, X. (Ed.). (2014), ICTs and the Millennium Development Goals: A United NationsPerspective,Springer.
- Kaur, H. Tao, X. (Ed.). (2014), ICTs and the Millennium Development Goals: A United Nations Perspective,Springer.
- Lagarde, C. (2013). Dare the Difference, Finance and Development, International Monetary Fund.
- Lechman, E., Kaur, H. (2015). Economic growth and female labor force participation – verifyingthe U-feminization hypothesis. New Evidence for 162 countries over the period 1990-2012, Economics and Sociology, Vol. 8, No 1.
- Lechman, E., & Okonowicz, A. (2013). Are Women Important for Economic Development?, CorporateSocial Responsibility and Women’s Entrepreneurship Around the Mare Balticum, 310.
- Mehtap, Salime et al. (2016). Factors Affecting Women’s Participation in the Jordanian Workforce,International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, Vol. 6, No. 10, pp. 790-793.
- Mincer, J. (1962). ‘Labor Force Participation of Married Women: A Study of Labor Supply’Aspects of Labor Economics - A Conference of the Universities: National BureauCommittee for Economic Research, Princeton University Press, NJ USA.
- Nezamivand Chegini, Z. & Saraei, H. (2012). Affecting Factors Tehran of Women's Participation in the Labor Force, Journal of welfare planning and Social development, Volume 4, Issue 15, pp. 1-45.
- Olivetti, C. (2013). The female labor force and long-run development: the American experience in comparativeperspective, NBER Working Paper 19131.
- Olukemi I. L. (2008). Female Laour Force Participation in Nigerian: Determinants and Trends;Oxford Business and Economic Conference Programme.
- Rajaeian, M.T. & Bagherpoor, P. (2015). Investigating the Affecting Factors the Rate of Economic Participation of Women with the System Dynamics Approach, Women's Psychological Social Studies, year 13, No. 2, pp. 7-36.
- St December, 2010 ILO (2012). Labour Review Report
- Tam, H. (2011). U-shaped female labor participation with economic development: Some paneldata evidence, Economics Letters, 110(2), pp.140-142.
- Tsani, S. et al. (2013). Female labour force participation and economic growth in the SouthMediterranean countries, Economics Letters 120 (2013) 323–328.
- UNDP, United Nations Development Fund. (2003). Human Development Indicators 2003. NewYork: Oxford University Press.
- Verick, S. (2014), Female Labor Force Participation in Developing Countries, IZA World of Labor, pp. 87-88.
- Zandi, F. et al. (2011). Role of economic growth in women’s participation for selected Asia countries, Journal of scientific research of women and culture, Third Year, No. 11, pp. 111-125.