Evaluation of Scientific Outcomes of Female Researchers at Yazd University Using Analytical Clarity Citation Index

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

• Azize hasankhani ¹
• saeed ghaffari ²

¹ daneshgah.gom

² -

10.30495/jzvj.2021.25093.3261

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the scientific outputs of female researchers affiliated with Yazd University using the analytical clarity citation index between 2010 and 2019. This research is of applied type and has been done by descriptive-survey method with the help of scientometric indicators. The statistical population of this study includes 4084 degrees from researchers of Yazd University during the years 2010 to 2019, which is indexed in the Analytic Clarity Citation Database. The research findings showed that the trend of publishing science production in 2010 to 2018 is ascending and in 2018 to 2019 as linear. Also, female researchers at Yazd University are very interested in working with researchers at the Islamic Azad University. The scientific communication network of the countries also showed that after Iran, India has established the most communication with other countries with 79 scientific couples. Female researchers at Yazd University are keen to partner with researchers in the United States. Engineering, mathematics and physics are the most widely used fields in the production of women affiliated with this university. A study of hot topics in women's research at Yazd University with the concurrent method of vocabulary also showed that the keywords "physics" and "fuzzy set" with the highest incidence of red dots have obtained the map. The journal of high energy physics has the most use among women in the university with the publication of 90 degrees. The university's female researchers have also used English and Arabic to produce scientific information.

Keywords

• Assessment
• Scientific outputs
• Yazd University
• Scientific indicators
• Analytic Clarity

20.1001.1.20088566.1400.12.46.11.2

---

References

1. Alasehir, O. (2010). University Ranking By Academic Performance: AScientometrics Study For Ranking World Universities. M.S. Department of Information Systems.
2. Chang, Y. W., Huang, M. H., & Lin, C. W. (2015). Evolution of research subjects in library and information science based on keyword, bibliographical coupling, and co-citation analyses. Scientometrics, 105(3), 2071-2087.‏
3. Fahimian, M. (2002). Investigating the status of scientific information production of faculty members of the Faculty of Engineering and Technology of Tarbiat Modares University from 1991 to 2000. Master Thesis. Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University.
4. Falah, M.; Ghorbi, A.; Nowruzi, A.; Jafari, A. (2019). Scientific study of scientific publications in the field of seismology based on the citation database of the Science website. Approach, 72, 63-78.

https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=480731

1. Ghane, M. R., & Mozafari, L. (2020). A Study of the Subject of" Public Libraries" in Web of Science and Islamic World Science Citation Center. International Journal of Information, 18(1), 35-48.‏
2. González-Alcaide, G., Salinas, A., & Ramos, J. M. (2018). Scientometrics Analysis Of Research Activity And Collaboration Patterns In Chagas Cardiomyopathy. Plos Neglected Tropical Diseases, 12(6), E0006602.‏
3. Jamali, J.; Manavifar, L.; Jamali,M. (2014). Evaluation of the scientific output of the faculty members of the paramedical school, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences based on Scopus database up to the end of 2012. Sadra Med Sci J, 2(2), 213-222.

https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=282486

1. Khalili M, Rahmatpour P, Barari F, Hoseinzadeh T. (2016). Scientific Outputs of Guilan University of Medical Sciences in Scopus Database Based on Scientometrics Indicators. jour guilan uni med sci. 25 (98), 9-16

https://journal.gums.ac.ir//browse.php?a_code=A-10-36-714&slc_lang=fa&sid=1

1. Nobakh, Y. (2018). Scientometrics of Behavioral Accounting Research in Iran. Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 7(27), 125-136.

https://jmaak.srbiau.ac.ir/article_12905.html

1. Rasolabadi M, Khezri A, Haydari A. (2012). Scientific output of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences according to scientometric indicators till the end of 2011. SJKU. 17 (2) :1-14

http://sjku.muk.ac.ir/article-1-794-fa.html

1. Razeghi, N.; Janalizadeh^, H.; Alizadeh^, M. (2015). Assessing the acientific quota of academic women in social sciences (with an emphasis on membership in academic departments and scientific research journals). Women in Development and Politics, 13(1), 93-112.

https://jwdp.ut.ac.ir/article_55208.html

1. Rostami, P. (2008). Investigating the status of scientific production of faculty members of the Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, 2001-2006. Master Thesis in Library and Information Science, Tarbiat Modares University.
2. Sedighi, M. (2015). Using of co-word analysis method in mapping of the structure of scientific fields (case study: The field of Informetrics), 30 (2), 373-396

https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/browse.php?a_id=2583&sid=1&slc_lang=fa

1. Shadi S, Asadi S, Nourmohammadi H. (2019). The Assessment of Iranian Systematic Review Articles in Biomedical Sciences Based on the Scientometrics Methods. Health Inf Manage, 16(5): 26-6.

http://him.mui.ac.ir/index.php/him/article/view/3971

1. Soheili, F., Khademi, R., & Mansoori, A. (2014). Correlation between Impact Factor and productivity with centrality measures in journals of Information science: A social network analysis. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM), 13(1).‏

https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=354984

1. Souza, F. C. D., Amorim, R. M., & Rêgo, L. C. (2016). A Co-authorship network analysis of CNPq’s productivity research fellows in the probability and statistic area. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 21(4), 29-47.‏
2. Van Eyk, H. J., Hooiveld, M. H. W., Van Leeuwen, T. N., Van Der Wurff, B. L. J., De Craen, A. J. M., & Dekker, F. W. (2010). Scientific Output Of Dutch Medical Students. Medical Teaching, 32(3), 231-235.